Technology Expertise
PostgreSQL Development & AI Integration
We design, change and tune PostgreSQL databases for applications where the data has to be right: schemas that model the business accurately, migrations that run while the application stays up, and queries that stay fast as the tables grow. When a product needs AI search over its own data, PostgreSQL with pgvector is often a good home for it too.
Start a PostgreSQL project →What PostgreSQL expertise does Code and Trust have?
Code and Trust works with PostgreSQL when it fits the project, and it often does; the right database depends on the scope and what the client asks for. We design schemas around how the business actually works, change them with backward-compatible migrations when the application has to stay online, tune slow queries from their execution plans, and add pgvector when a product needs semantic search without a second database.
Schema design that matches the business
Most database trouble starts in the first month, when a schema is shaped by the first screen someone built rather than by the business it describes. The fix is to model the entities, the relationships and the rules first: what must be unique, what can never be missing, what happens to a child record when its parent is deleted. Those rules go into the database as constraints, not only into application code, so bad data is refused at the door no matter which service or script tries to write it.
- →Normalized core tables, with deliberate exceptions where a query needs them
- →Foreign keys, unique and check constraints that enforce the business rules
- →JSONB for data whose shape really varies, not as a substitute for a schema
- →Naming and migration conventions written down so the next engineer follows them
Changing the schema without taking the app down
The riskiest moment in a database's life is a schema change on a live system. The safe way to do it is expand and contract: add the new shape alongside the old, ship code that writes both, backfill, switch reads, and only then remove the old shape in a later release (see our glossary entry on zero-downtime migration). Each migration should be safe against the code that is running when it lands. Where an index has to be built on a busy table, it can be built concurrently, which PostgreSQL does "without taking any locks that prevent concurrent inserts, updates, or deletes on the table" (CREATE INDEX documentation, read 2026-09-30).
Finding and fixing slow queries
Slow applications are usually a handful of slow queries, and guessing which ones wastes time. The place to start is evidence: the queries that take the most total time in production, then their execution plans. The fix is often an index that matches how the data is actually filtered and sorted, sometimes a rewritten query, occasionally a schema change, and now and then a cache for data that does not need to be live. Measuring before and after on the same queries makes the improvement a number, not an impression.
- →Query statistics to find where the time actually goes
- →Execution plans read before any index is added
- →Indexes designed for real filter and sort patterns, and unused ones removed
- →Connection pooling (PgBouncer or the provider's pooler) for serverless and high-concurrency apps
AI search in the database you already run
When a product needs retrieval-augmented generation or semantic search over its own documents, PostgreSQL with pgvector is often a good place to store the embeddings; pgvector is an open-source extension that adds "vector similarity search for Postgres" (pgvector on GitHub, read 2026-09-30). Keeping vectors next to the rows they describe means one backup, one access-control model and one place to filter by customer, date or permission before similarity is ranked. A dedicated vector database is worth its extra moving part when the scale or the query pattern calls for it. Our database design and development page covers the wider service.
Hosting and operations
PostgreSQL runs well on several managed platforms, and the right one depends on your cloud, your compliance needs and whether you want branching for preview environments. Neon, Supabase and Amazon RDS are examples of managed PostgreSQL platforms with different trade-offs, and our own site runs on Neon PostgreSQL. Whatever the host, the operations basics are worth settling in the scope: backups that have been restored in a test, encryption in transit and at rest, separate credentials per environment, and monitoring that alerts someone when a query or a connection count goes wrong.
Why Code and Trust uses PostgreSQL
Code and Trust selects PostgreSQL for projects where it provides a demonstrable engineering advantage: better performance, lower operational overhead, or faster iteration cycles. Every technology choice is justified by requirements, not familiarity.
Production-proven
Our PostgreSQL implementations run in production at enterprise scale, not greenfield experiments. We understand the failure modes.
AI-native integration
We combine PostgreSQL with modern LLM APIs and AI tooling, not as an add-on, but as a core architectural decision from day one.
Handoff-ready
Every project ships with inline documentation, automated tests, and a knowledge transfer session, so your team can own and extend it independently.
PostgreSQL projects: common questions
When is PostgreSQL the right database?
Often. It handles relational data, JSON documents, full-text search and, with pgvector, vector search in one engine, with strong constraints to keep data correct, which covers many applications without a second database. The right choice still depends on the project, the existing systems and what the client asks for, and we work with other databases when those call for them.
Can you change our schema without downtime?
Usually, yes. The safe way is expand and contract: the new shape is added alongside the old, the code moves over in stages, and the old shape is removed in a later release. Large indexes are built concurrently so writes keep flowing. If a change cannot be made fully online, the scope says so before the work starts.
Our database has become slow. Where do you start?
With evidence: the queries that consume the most time in production and their execution plans. Most slowdowns come from a small number of queries, and the fix is often an index that matches how the data is actually queried. We measure before and after on the same queries.
Should we use pgvector or a dedicated vector database?
For most products, pgvector is the simpler choice: embeddings live next to the data they describe, under the same backups and access rules. A dedicated vector database is worth its extra moving part at very large scale or with unusual query patterns.
Can you migrate us to PostgreSQL from another database?
Yes. For one fintech platform client, whom we do not name, we moved a MySQL 5.7 database to PostgreSQL 15 with pgvector, which supports AI transaction categorization and fraud detection; our database design page describes it. Where the system has to stay up, the old and new databases can run in parallel until the new one has proven itself; the plan depends on the project.
Start a PostgreSQL project with Code and Trust
Tell us what you're building. We'll scope it, resource it, and give you a fixed-price quote, with no billing-by-the-hour surprises.
Start a PostgreSQL project →